Earlier this year, a story emerged involving a luxury New York City apartment building implementing a “poor door” policy, sparking understandable public outrage and accusations of blatant tenant discrimination. According to reports, One Riverside Park – which boasts both $2.1 million “tower townhomes” and $830/month low-income housing – constructed two separate entrances to the building, one for low income residents and one for the units that were not low income.
Almost immediately, residents and New Yorkers alike decried the blatant elitism even though others explained that the alternate entrance was related solely to the availability of certain common areas not accessible to low-income renters.
From a discrimination standpoint, does this “poor door” policy violate the Fair Housing Act or relevant applicable anti-discrimination housing statutes? In all likelihood, probably not – particularly considering the fact the building adheres to New York City’s Inclusionary Housing Program, and had a rational basis for the separation of entrances.
However, the story stands as a reminder to condominium associations that anti-discrimination laws absolutely do apply in the resident application process, notwithstanding the private sector nature of an elected, resident-maintained condo association board.
In many New York and New Jersey condominiums, boards are tasked with reviewing applications for the rent or purchase of a building unit. If a condominium’s governing documents allow the board to refuse an application, the following factors cannot be considered in that decision:
Moreover, a board is not permitted to make assumptions about an applicant’s membership in any of the above classes, based on that applicant’s name or current address.
In addition, generally speaking, a condominium association is not permitted to disqualify a potential resident based on age or that person’s status as a parent, or the fact that he/she has children. Certain narrow exceptions apply to this mandate, however, notably in the context of condominiums catering to those of retirement age (e.g., 55+ communities). Under regulations enforced by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), 55+ communities are permitted to exclude children, provided the following three criteria are met:
Even if the criteria are met, a condominium association may only limit its residents to senior citizens. The failure to meet the above-mentioned criteria, while also refusing to admit applicants with young children, may result in exposure to liability for discrimination based on familial status.
If you are involved with the Board of your condominium association and would like to ensure that your community’s policies are lawful, contact Griffin Alexander, P.C. today: (973) 366-1188.
415 Route 10
Randolph, NJ 07869
East Brunswick Office
197 Route 18 South
Suite 3000, South Wing
East Brunswick, NJ 08816
Mount Laurel Office
309 Fellowship Road
East Gate Center, Suite 200
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
New York Office
New York, NY 10004